On leadership, feminism and gender equality
We sat down with Patience Poni Ayikoru, a young female leader and the Guild Speaker at Uganda Christian University to talk about leadership, feminism, and gender equality.
First
off, who is Patience Poni Ayikoru?
Patience
Poni Ayikoru is a final year student of Law at Uganda Christian University. She
proudly hails from Koboko District in West Nile region of Uganda. Patience is
passionate about leadership and has been a participant in many leadership
spaces. She is also a champion of women and girls’ rights and access to equal
opportunities and resources that they very well deserve.
Many
have faulted young people for their disinterest in nation-building let alone
any civic affairs. As a young person who is deeply invested in leadership, is
this a right indictment?
I’d say yes
and no.
No, to a
greater extent because many youth are actually willing to participate in civic
space. However, the conditions and circumstances that surround the opportunities
to their engagement in civic space is shrinking. Most youth have often shown
interest in nation-building by coming up with new technologies, engaging in
political and non-political spaces, and passionately doing so; however, the
platforms are not independently theirs as youth. Many spaces are populated by
older people for example workplaces and the youth end up toiling around.
Even on some platforms for engagement on youth ideologies; sometimes the panels are filled with so many older people. Lastly, the cost of engaging in politics and the bureaucracy at the Electoral processes most times deprive youth of their ability to yield their potential.
| Participating at the 2020 Transformational Leadership Training by Action Aid and Global Platform Uganda at Rose Villa Hotel in Arua |
Would
it be safe to say then that the civil uprisings we have witnessed across the
continent in recent times are a result of the shrinking space for political
engagement of the youth? A case in point was the #EndSars movement in Nigeria
which threatened to end Buhari’s reign or the more recent upheavals in South
Africa to mention but a few?
Partly it
would be safe to say. These civil uprisings have been there before and
sometimes not as a result of youths' shrinking space for political engagement.
Political
freedoms are not a luxury in a democratic state; they are a necessity. A
democratic society cannot be built or preserved if freedom of assembly and
freedom of association are not guaranteed, encouraged and respected. Freedom of
assembly and freedom of association are key building blocks of democratic
security.
Some of
these uprisings have been a result of the checks on democracy across the
globe.
Talking
about democracy which plainly put would be 'rule by the people'. In other words,
people decide how they are governed. As a young female leader, what are some of
the systemic challenges you have noticed stifle female participation in
leadership?
The
challenges that women face are numerous. For starters, there is a feminization
of poverty in developing countries. Women face the disproportionate burden of
poverty, hunger, illiteracy, and lack of access to essential services including
shelter, water, sanitation, health, and energy which are most inclined towards
women. And it’s even worse for those in the rural areas as they lack collateral
security to back their access to financial aid or to own property which in turn
would elevate their participation in leadership. Somewhat all these
circumstances and challenges work alongside each other and stifle women’s
ability to take up leadership positions easily.
Although
women's contribution to economic growth and development of countries - both
developed and developing - is substantial, the majority of women are in
vulnerable jobs and gender wage gaps are still large. Across all regions and sectors,
women are paid between 10 and 30 percent less than men. They constitute
two-thirds of the world's illiterates and continue to be discriminated against
in their access to education. Gender-based discrimination is further compounded
by disability, race, and ethnicity. All these drastically stifle their
participation in leadership.
In many
countries including democracies, women's voice, participation, and leadership in
all areas is stifled under the burden of social, cultural, religious taboos and
prejudices, and societal stereotypes against their participation. A clear
description of this is in Dr. Sylvia Tamale’s book When the Hen Begins to
Crow.
So far,
only 28 countries have achieved or surpassed the 30 percent critical mass for
women's representation in parliament and in other political and governance
forums. Women are Heads of State and Government in only 21 countries, despite
the strong case that their leadership makes for more inclusive decision-making
and more representative governance.
What
ought to be done to redress this?
Having programs
on leadership and participation guided by a history of international commitments
to women’s representation. The UN Women I saw has always been at this; pushing
hard and with emphasis on The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women upholds women’s right to participate in public
life, while the Beijing Platform for Action calls for removing barriers to
equal participation.
Another way
is to provide training for women political candidates to help build their
capacities and offer voter and civic education and sensitization campaigns on
gender equality as well as backing gender equality advocates in calling on
political parties, governments, and others to do their part in empowering women.
Other
initiatives should encourage young men and women to engage in advocacy around
making gender equality measures central to public policymaking.
Additionally
advocating for legislative and constitutional reforms to ensure women’s fair access
to political spheres—as voters, candidates, elected officials, and civil service
members and working with communities to challenge and change attitudes towards
women.
These
redresses are not new in the face of Generation Equality however it is
important to emphasize them and put to action most of them not only in urban
areas but also in the rural areas. And this can be easier by collaborating with
various civil society organizations and governments.
In Uganda, I have seen most recently the Forum for Women in Democracy conducting training to newly elected Women Members of Parliament on the same and Akina Mama Wa Afrika and the UN Women collaboratively empowering younger women in leadership.
Let’s
talk about feminism for a bit. If there’s any philosophy - if I can term it
that way - which has drawn as much heat to itself in the recent past, this must
be it. To begin with, what exactly is feminism?
Feminism is
the belief in full access to social, economic, and political equality for
women. Feminism largely arose as a movement in response to Western traditions
that restricted the rights of women, and there are a number of feminist
ideologies that fall under its school of thought like liberal, radical,
African, black feminist perspectives. All in a bid to achieve the aim of equal
access to opportunities in the social, political, and economic sectors for
women.
Briefly
tell us about the key tenets of African feminism and distinctions from its
parent ideology?
African
feminism is a type of feminism innovated by African women that specifically
addresses the conditions and needs of continental African women and strives to
create a new, liberal, productive, and self-reliant African woman within the
heterogeneous cultures of Africa.
Feminism in
Africa, ultimately, aims at modifying culture as it affects women in different
societies.
Generally,
Western feminists disagree with the view that men are equally oppressed under
patriarchy, while African feminists agree that men are similarly oppressed and
that gender equality means oppression of neither gender.
African
feminism set off in the early twentieth century with women like Adelaide
Casely-Hayford, the Sierra Leonian women’s rights activist referred to as the “African
Victorian Feminist” who contributed widely to both pan-African and feminist
goals, and Charlotte Maxeke who in 1918 founded the Bantu Women’s League in
South Africa and Huda Sharaawi who in 1923 established the Egyptian Feminist
Union.
By
all measures, feminism seems to be hinged upon a pertinent and moral foundation
- upholding of women’s rights - which for all intents, is a worthy cause.
However, there’s been a breed of feminists that have incessantly made vehement
attacks not on patriarchy as a system but menfolk as if saying that the raison
d’ĂȘtre of feminism is to pit men against women. Do we want to say the gospel of
feminism has been lost in translation?
Feminist
male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature.
Feminism like I described is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label
is either a smear or a misunderstanding.
I know, a
lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into
attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk,
the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit.
Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such
generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar
indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic.
This gender
lashing does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality. If
anything, the fixation on men behaving badly is a distraction from more
fundamental issues, such as changes in the workplace to promote work-life
balance, fronting laws that protect women’s dignity, and our equal access to
opportunities and resources.
What’s
more, male-bashing not only sours many men — and quite a few women — on
feminism. It often drives them into Internet subcultures where critiques of
feminism mix with hostility toward women.
Fair
enough, finally, if you had one opportunity to say something to the powers that
be, what would that be?
I choose to say those in authority either political or in
hierarchy as in various societies and organizations because power sounds so hyped
negatively.
To those in these leadership positions, I want you to know that the relevance of all you do is not in the positions held, but the impact on the people you serve. The impact emanated from your servanthood leadership. Leaders need to adopt humility and understand that to truly choose to love is a heroic act. You should be conscious of power in society and the way it operates.
Thank
you for choosing to speak to us!
Comments